[FREE WEBINAR] 3 Ways ESM in Freshservice helps in Returning to Work | 10 AM PST | 11 AM AEST | 11 AM CEST - 10th Sept SAVE YOUR SEAT

Start a new topic
In Progress

Knowledge base enhancements

We understand that lack of self service adoption is one of the biggest pain points of IT teams. The backbone of self-service is availability of Knowledge base articles and accessibility to these articles. For the former problem, we want to enhance the content creation experience, so that IT teams can create more content, easily. We plan to enhance Knowledge base through the following: 


1. Better Editor - The current editor is, let's admit it, not the best out there. We want to create a better editor that makes it easier to write and format articles. 

2. Approvals - Now Managers can set ensure the format and review the content of the solution before it is published. Managers can set approver (one or many) at folder level, and all articles created inside that folder will have to be approved before it can be published. 

3. Review Date - In a lot of organizations, the processes change and tools evolve, and solutions team finds it hard to keep the articles updated. Now you can set Review Date for the articles, you will be reminded on that date to review the particular article.

4. Analytics - It's important to get feedback and understand which articles were helpful in resolving an issue. Now you can see the number of views for each article, along with the helpful and not helpful votes and number of times an article was inserted into a ticket by an agent. 

5. Better Access Controls - You can restrict agents to have view-only permission to the article and not have edit permissions to a particular article. This works best for cases where different functions within the organization are using Freshservice - HR is an agent and they can only view IT articles but can edit and create HR articles. 


Joe



41 people like this idea

Donna the really annoying thing is that is how it used to work for Solutions Articles, they removed it with the update.


1 person likes this

Agreed. The change is not beneficial in the least. Different developers? There needs to be guidelines that provide consistency across the platform. 

One other enhancement request would be to allow the review date to be marked as mandatory at the folder level. I know approvers could catch a missing review date field and reject it, but if it is required before submission then even less review work would be required.  


1 person likes this

Ability to Copy/Duplicate Solutions would be super helpful


1 person likes this
Login or Signup to post a comment