Hi can we please consider removing this feature that automatically assigns an asset an asset tag reference/number or make this an option rather than being compulsory. Most if not all organisations will already have a naming convention in place well before taking Fresh Service on and this means this won't align to the naming convention Fresh Service use.
Purely as example I may have a 6 digit asset number and the first numeric character is 1 and this donates the hardware is a desktop and then I have another 6 digit asset number and the first numeric character is a 2 and this donates that the hardware is a laptop and so on and so on.
Why do we have to have an asset tag assigned? I see no benefit whatsoever for this
1 person likes this idea
1 Comment
K
Karthik Pasupathy Ramachandran
said
over 2 years ago
Hi Darrell,
Thank you for your feedback.
I can understand your use case. We'll pass on your request to our product team for their consideration.
We'll keep you posted regarding any updates on this front.
Darrell Jordan
Hi can we please consider removing this feature that automatically assigns an asset an asset tag reference/number or make this an option rather than being compulsory. Most if not all organisations will already have a naming convention in place well before taking Fresh Service on and this means this won't align to the naming convention Fresh Service use.
Purely as example I may have a 6 digit asset number and the first numeric character is 1 and this donates the hardware is a desktop and then I have another 6 digit asset number and the first numeric character is a 2 and this donates that the hardware is a laptop and so on and so on.
Why do we have to have an asset tag assigned? I see no benefit whatsoever for this
1 person likes this idea